Monday, February 16, 2009

Reasons for a Literal Interpretion of God's Word

Reasons for a Literal Hermeneutic:

“When the plain sense makes good sense, seek no other sense.” - Hermeneutical Slogan

1. Philosophical Reason -

Language was given to communicate meaning. God’s Word is conveyed to present and confirm a message.

2. Biblical Reason -

Prophecies were fulfilled in a literal way.

3. Logical Reason -

All objectivity is lost. The interpretation is based on the mind of the interpreter, so the interpretation is subjective to the mind of the person.

Literal Hermeneutics with Axioms:

1. Some truth is given by way of accommodation

Anthropomorphisms - Displays God as having human body parts.
God is described as having arms (Isaiah 53:1, 59:1, Romans 10:21)
We see God seemingly changing His mind (Genesis 6:6)

Anthropopathisms - God in human terms that we can understand
God laughs (Psalm 2:4)
God is weary (Isaiah 1:14, 7:13)

Scientific data described phenomenally rather than technically.
Matthew 5:45 - Sun Rises
Mark 1:32 - Sun Sets

So God’s Word was not meant to be a science textbook, these passages obviously do not state that the earth is at the center of the universe, it just uses cultural dialect to impose a thought in respect to God’s revelation.

2. Interpretation must keep a sound historical basis

Seemingly decent illustration would be the water in John 3:5 as not meaning baptismal regeneration.

If we understand the historical context behind the verse in John 3:5 and other similar passages that seemingly point to baptismal regeneration, then we will understand what was truly being said by these passages.

3. Interpretation is ONE. Application is MANY.

Seemingly decent principle would be John 3:30, John the Baptist was saying that he must decrease in popularity. This is a huge applicatory verse that all Christians should understand that Christ should be magnified above us all.

If we try to interpret passages to fit our lives, then the passages are conformed to our lives and all objectivity is lost. The Lord demands a standard all throughout His Word, so there is an objective standard to understanding God’s revelation.

4. No statement in the Holy Scriptures should be interpreted as having more than one meaning unless usually strong reasons warrant it.

If the material that the Bible addresses is to have more than one reason, then again, who determines what is right? Who determines the standard as to how far we are to understand and interpret the Word of God? There must be an objective standard to interpreting God’s Word.

5. Interpret the Bible Harmonistically

A. An author does not contradict Himself (Acts 2:38 with Acts 16:30-31 or I Cor. 15:29 with I Cor. 15:1-4)

For instance, baptismal regeneration (Acts 2:38) was something that was contradicted by the Acts 16 passage, so there must be some other interpretation of Acts 2:38.

B. An author does not contradict another author

C. The Old Testament does not contradict the New Testament.

Decent Example: The Old Testament does not teach polygamy and the New Testament monogamy.

If there seems to be a contradiction in the Word of God, then the problem is not the Bible, the problem is the interpreter.

6 Reasons Why a Literal Hermeneutic is Important
1. Restricts the amount of human distortion that allegorizing allows. “Objectivity”
2. Applies appropriate scripture to its addressees
3. Exposes the Distortions of Cults. (Prosperity Gospel, Social Gospel, Liberation Theology)
4. Fulfills the calling of language, God communicates to His people clearly.
5. Recognizes the continuing importance of the nation of Israel and God’s covenants.
6. Prophecies concerning Christ were fulfilled literally.

(I Corinthians 4:6, II Peter 1:20-21)

4 Reasons Why a Desire for a Figurative Interpretation:

1. Appeals to an intellectual aspect within mankind - for instance - Calvinism has spread because it takes a logical aspect to explain the philosophy of Calvinism.

2. Appeals to possible spiritual experiences - for instance - St. Augustine, the theological father of allegorical interpretation, read the writings of Origen.
Origen taught three levels of spiritual understanding:

1. Soma - literal meaning of scripture, anyone can understand
2. Psyche - some allegorical additions; this view reserved for some
3. Pneuma - a few spiritual people are chosen from each generation to understand this deep level of understanding.

Unfortunately, Origen’s logic doesn’t add up. It doesn’t seem that God will only reveal His Spiritual aspects to people that seek Him but cannot reach His full revelation.

3. Appeals to the subjective attitudes of people - for instance - people desire to be like God (note how Satan tempted Eve in the garden), so they try to bring the scriptures under their level of intellect and try to force scripture to conform to their system of understanding.

Also, it should be noted that people who desire to “skip over” some passages of the Bible do so and call it figurative interpretation. Why? Because it’s man’s desire to bring the standard that God has set down to their level of understanding.

4. Appeals to the “popular crowd” - for instance - when people claim to have a divine revelation from God, it catches people’s attention, therefore drawing attention to the one that has the supposed revelation from God.

People that claim the allegorical interpretation grow congregations that feed on their minds and their opinions about the Bible rather than studying the Bible and letting God reveal Himself to them through His Word.

It’s an obvious note that the reasons that people come to the love of this interpretation are always birthed out of fleshly motives. They love the praise of men rather than the service and humility that God desires.

Precision is demanded in our culture and always has, God has answered with His literal Holy Word.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Realization of Grace (Part 1)

Realization of Grace - Jacob (Genesis 29:1-12)

Jacob was a respectable man by today’s standards. He earned what he got, he lived in light of what was his own. Jacob was a man that was completely exemplary for today’s society. What Jacob wanted, Jacob worked for. This is respectable right?

In Genesis 29:1-12 we see that Jacob comes over a hill. He’s hanging out with some guys buy the local watering well, when a woman walks over a hill. Jacob sees her and instantly falls in love with her. While staying in touch with Jacob’s mindset, he knew that if he wanted her to love him back, he had to work for it.

This is the mindset of men in today’s society, we have to work for love and work to make people love us. Unfortunately, this is a sign of serious arrogance. If a person loves another person, then there is nothing that anyone can do to make that person love the other any more or any less.

For someone to think that they can earn another person’s love, puts the responsibility of love on the their shoulders rather than the one that is doing the loving. With this in mind, we can conclude that we are working to find a place in someone’s heart by our actions, therefore, we have ourselves on our minds and cannot possibly be thinking at all about the other person. This is pride.

When Jacob sees Rachel, he does the most romantic thing, he throws a big rock and kisses and cries with her. He tried to be manly, this is not an appropriate gift to offer a woman, Jacob’s mind was on himself. If you know any women at all, you know that they are not impressed by displays of men’s manhood. But Rachel loved Jacob anyway.

This is a picture of grace. Grace is when God’s love for us is so big, that he chooses to have His Son die for us, we can’t earn it, because God is so holy that we cannot approach His throne at all with the slightest mistake in our lives. So, God’s Son paid the debt that no one could ever pay, therefore Grace was poured out on all who would believe.

The challenge comes though, when someone will just stop trying to do the respectable thing of trying to earn what the get, but Salvation is nothing that you can earn. All you can do is humbly accept the free offer of God’s Grace. So, stop trying and let go, let God pick up where you left off.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Popular Theology

So I've recently undergone much thought and challenge by God through some friends and some studying about the crisis of the local churches in America. It seems that churches are chasing "the new thing" that gets people to church to hear the gospel. This comes alot from the worldview of Postmodernism Christianity that states that the church should toss out doctrine and just work on relating to the culture to the highest degree. My dilemma is, "How is that working out for ya?" The answer to my own question is simple, it's not.

Sure many people flock to hear the latest songs played by the hottest bands. It's a free concert being thrown by the local church that really just encourages rebellion. But, is there any thought at all about the gospel, the most important thing?

As I sit in the seat of the spectator watching these events, I notice that there is a problem with the presentation of the gospel as the distorted truth is being manifested through a terrible problem known as Seeker Friendliness.

Please tell me what your thoughts are on this epidemic and if you are a fan of Seeker Friendliness or a consistent fighter against it. Some people Is it possible for some people to ride the fence on this issue?

Relationship of the Church and Israel

So here's the dilemma, there's a huge controvery among Evangelical circles that is causing splits in churches all across the world. Has the church replaced Israel? Is there a common ground in the middle that people can come to unity over or is this a topic that deserves Ecclesiastical Separation? I would like to hear you opinions on this subject. Tell me about it...

A Little Spat on Christian Worship

What if we stopped trying to define what worship is and just worship? It seems that American Christianity seems to be caught up in the ‘Explicities’ rather than the ‘Simplicities.’ There seems to be a fine line drawn in the sand that should not be crossed by our mindset. When concern for minority becomes our major mindset, then worship becomes just another empty religious ritual, and let’s face it, the world doesn’t need anymore of those does it?



When will worship and doctrine become practical and ethical? This question has been a big concern of mine through several conversations that I’ve had with brothers and sisters of different theological viewpoints. When we believe something, then it should be practiced, right? At least that’s what I’ve learned in my interaction with people. People say that our beliefs will focus our attitudes, therefore our behavior will be affected. This is correct, but why is it that when I look at my belief system my behavior is not always a reflection of it? I believe in a process known as Progressive Sanctification, but how come it seems that no progress is being made by the Holy Spirit at times?



This is where the rubber meets the road. I’m studying and learning all sorts of things while in class. I mean I’m getting my head slammed full of material that I will be handling for the rest of my life. I’ve been taught a lot and still have a long road ahead of me. With great power comes great responsibility, right? If what they say about our behavior being a reflection of our beliefs, then my behavior should reflect what I’m learning, but it doesn’t always do that. Many of my friends can testify to how I’ve done and said bad things around them. I don’t understand how things just slip out of me like it’s nobody’s business.



Jesus said in Matthew 15:18-19 that what comes out of the mouth is a direct correlation of what comes from the heart. Jeremiah 17:9 shows that the heart is not always as it seems to us and our evil intentions are often hid by a deceitful heart. In other words, in comparison to what we believe and how we behave, we are in bad shape.



I think that reverential worship (the only way to worship) is through a direct understanding of who God is and where we stand before Him. God is the perfect, holy being that set forth the entire universe with words! I don’t think that we as Christians truly understand this completely, or we would be more in awe of what was going on. If worship indicates a direct link to God and a communing fellowship with God, then we need to be more reverential before the throne of our God.



To come to His throne with the respect that He is due, we need to come in full recognition of ourselves. We need to be in remembrance of the terrible person that we are and the holy Being that our God is. This is the essence of worship. If this is our attitude then whatever follows will be God-centered and completely void of all flesh. Understanding who we are without the divine intervention of our God is the only way to approach His presence.



Moses understood this when He approached the burning bush. Isaiah understood this when answering the call from God. Peter understood this when Jesus called him in Luke. Paul understood this when he was enveloped in the presence of Christ on the Damascus road.



When will we understand this as well? When will we get a full reverential attitude toward the worship of our God that causes us to bow. Worship is not a mindset, it’s a response, it’s a response to the presence of God’s glory being manifested in our sinful hearts.